Posted by: Bob Quinn on December 12, 2013 at 4:37 pm
The following statement may be attributed to Bob Quinn, AT&T’s Senior Vice President-Federal Regulatory and Chief Privacy Officer:
“The Federal Communications Commission (FCC), under the leadership of Chairman Wheeler, has set a clear path for cementing our country’s state of the art communications future. While the transition to 21st century network technologies and communications services is well underway, the status report issued today by the FCC’s Technology Transitions Policy Task Force sets forth the plans for an Order at its January open meeting. That Order will address, among other things, the goals, schedule and various policy issues as the transition moves forward.
“We support the FCC’s ambitious Internet-Protocol (IP) agenda, particularly the FCC’s recommendation to bring service experiments or IP trials to fruition. These IP trials will give policymakers and all stakeholders the ability to observe and learn from the facts on the ground, rather than being frozen by false fears. Ultimately, the IP trials will ensure that no one is left behind as the country moves forward to an Internet-enabled future.
“We look forward to working cooperatively with the Commission as it moves in earnest to manage the transition to IP technologies and services.”
Posted by: AT&T Blog Team on December 11, 2013 at 2:12 pm
Today, the Energy & Commerce Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R. 3674, the Federal Spectrum Incentive Act and H.R. 3675, the Federal Communications Commission Process Reform Act. The following statement may be attributed to AT&T’s Executive Vice President-Federal Relations Tim McKone:
“I want to applaud Committee Chairman Fred Upton and Subcommittee Chairman Greg Walden and Committee Ranking Member Henry Waxman and Subcommittee Ranking Member Anna Eshoo for their leadership in moving these important pieces of legislation.”
“I also want to applaud Reps. Brett Guthrie and Doris Matsui for bringing creative solutions to our nation’s spectrum policy. We believe the legislation, while not practical for all government agencies, provides a workable alternative to those agencies that have stopped using or have found alternative systems for their wireless communications needs. The approaching spectrum crunch calls for unique proposals like this and others that will provide federal agencies the funding they need to research and develop new techniques and systems that will allow the agency to perform their mission. This bill’s approach directly incents agencies to clear spectrum for commercial auction, which will ultimately translate into economic growth, and, importantly, provide consumers with new and innovative mobile Internet services.”
“The FCC process reform bill modernizes FCC practices and procedures. These much needed institutional reforms will help arm the agency with the tools to keep pace with the Internet speed of today’s marketplace. It will also ensure that outmoded regulatory practices for today’s competitive marketplace are properly placed in the dustbin of history.”
“We look forward to working with Congress, the FCC, and all stakeholders to ensure the Federal Spectrum Incentive Act and the Federal Communications Commission Process Reform Act move forward to fruition.”
Posted by: Joan Marsh on December 9, 2013 at 10:00 am
In an op ed last week, CCA again called for auction limits to “prevent the two dominant wireless carriers from blocking competitors’ access to low-frequency spectrum.” The problem, according to CCA, is that AT&T and Verizon control a significant portfolio of low band spectrum. CCA also alleges we were “handed” our 850 MHz allocations “free of charge” (despite the fact that the vast majority of our current 850 MHz licenses were acquired for significant value on the secondary market).
Finally, CCA alleges that we “want to keep other cellphone carriers (including, presumably, CCA members) from getting access” to low band allocations. CCA specifically identifies three member companies – Bluegrass Cellular, Cellcom, Cellular One – that “are anxious to further expand in rural America, and they need low-frequency spectrum to do so.”
As with so many arguments in the high band/low band spectrum debate, these arguments are made without much reliance on facts. So, let’s look at some relevant facts, starting with the three member companies CCA identifies in support of their argument:
Posted by: AT&T Blog Team on December 6, 2013 at 12:28 pm
The following statement may be attributed to Joan Marsh, AT&T Vice President of Federal Regulatory:
“The 600 MHz incentive auction is by far the most complex auction proceeding ever undertaken anywhere in the world. The Commission must persuade two different sets of auction bidders to participate in two separate but inter-related auctions. While those auctions proceed, the Commission must conduct a dynamic repacking analysis that protects and repacks the broadcasters that remain.
“The enormous complexity of this task cannot be overstated. While AT&T is eager to see new spectrum allocations brought to market as soon as practical, we appreciate the enormity of the task the Commission faces and believe that it is essential that time be taken to get it right. The schedule the Chairman announced today to develop a robust policy and systems framework for the auction is both prudent and reasonable and AT&T looks forward to continuing to work with the FCC on this important proceeding.”
Posted by: AT&T Blog Team on December 3, 2013 at 4:56 pm
The following may be attributed to Jim Cicconi, AT&T Senior Executive Vice President-External and Legislative Affairs:
“We applaud Chairman Walden and Chairman Upton for taking this critical step to ensure America’s telecommunications laws are aligned with the explosion of new technologies and expanding consumer needs. Their decision recognizes that current laws are woefully outdated, that they fail to provide the level playing field needed by competing services and technologies, and that they have become an impediment to investment and economic growth.
“We look forward to working constructively with the Chairmen and the Congress on this exciting challenge.”