AT&T on Modernizing Communications Laws

Posted by: AT&T Blog Team on May 4, 2012 at 3:28 pm

In case you missed it, the Progressive Policy Institute this week held a conference here in Washington at the National Press Club on the economic implications of the wireless boom. AT&T’s Jim Cicconi delivered remarks that focused on the outdated regulations that stand to affect the growth and innovation of the wireless market. Check out the videos below to hear more from Jim on modernizing current communications laws to better fit the ever changing marketplace, and other panelists talking about the wireless boon.

Here, Jim talks about how the regulatory structure in this country is designed to oversee a wireline voice monopoly, which does not exist today.

And here, Jim talks about how the Telecom Act is out of date and that there’s a need to take a fresh look at modernizing the function of the FCC  as well.

Roger Enter of Recon Analytics discusses his new study, “The Wireless Industry: The Essential Engine of U.S. Economic Growth,” and the impact the wireless industry has on job creation and GDP.

Tom Hazlett, Professor of Law & Economics at the nearby George Mason University, talks about the wireless innovation wave and that it is just beginning.

Mike Mandel, Chief Economic Strategist of the Progressive Policy Institute, addresses how while investment by the government has been falling in recent years, investment by wireless providers is very strong.  Are they “investment heroes”?

Read More

Clips from FSF’s
Telecom Policy Conference

Posted by: AT&T Blog Team on March 23, 2012 at 4:18 pm

Jim Cicconi

On Tuesday, AT&T’s Jim Cicconi spoke at the Free State Foundation’s Telecom Policy Conference and addressed government regulation of the Internet.  He discussed the steps some international policymakers have taken to impose onerous regulations on the industry.  And while President Obama and his Administration has strongly opposed such measures, the US Government’s policies don’t always synch up with the actions of the Federal Communications Commission.  These conflicts are not lost on international policymakers, according to Cicconi, and we cannot succeed with a “do as I say, not as I do” approach.  “Getting more Internet infrastructure in this country should be our Government’s number one priority, whether it’s wireless spectrum or last-mile fiber,”

said Cicconi.

Read More

AT&T Statement on T-Mobile
Closing Seven Call Centers

Posted by: AT&T Blog Team on March 23, 2012 at 1:07 pm

The following statement may be attributed to Jim Cicconi, AT&T Senior Executive Vice President of External and Legislative Affairs:

“Yesterday, T-Mobile made the sad announcement that it would be closing seven call centers, laying off thousands of workers, and that more layoff announcements may follow. Normally, we’d not comment on something like this. But I feel this is an exception for one big reason– only a few months ago AT&T promised to preserve these very same call centers and jobs if our merger was approved. We also predicted that if the merger failed, T-Mobile would be forced into major layoffs.

“At that time, the current FCC not only rejected our pledges and predictions, they also questioned our credibility. The FCC argued that the merger would cost jobs, not preserve them, and that rejecting it would save jobs. In short, the FCC said they were right, we were wrong, and did so in an aggressive and adamant way.

“Rarely are a regulatory agency’s predictive judgments proven so wrong so fast. But for the government’s decision, centers now being closed would be staying open, workers now facing layoffs would have job guarantees, and communities facing turmoil would have security. Only a few months later, the truth of who was right is sadly obvious.

“So what’s the lesson here? For one thing, it’s a reminder of why “regulatory humility” should be more than a slogan. The FCC may consider itself an expert agency on telecom, but it is not omniscient. And when it ventures far afield from technical issues, and into judgments about employment or predictions about business decisions, it has often been wildly wrong. The other lesson is even more important, and should be sobering. It is a reminder that in government, as in life, decisions have consequences. One must approach them not as an exercise of power but instead of responsibility, because, as I learned in my years of public service, the price of a bad decision is too often paid by someone else.”

Read More

AT&T Statement on Incentive
Spectrum Auction Legislation

Posted by: AT&T Blog Team on February 16, 2012 at 1:37 pm

The following may be attributed to Jim Cicconi, AT&T Senior Executive Vice President of External and Legislative Affairs:

“We applaud House and Senate negotiators for doing something truly important to our Nation – successfully crafting major spectrum legislation.  Our company has been working on this with key leaders in both chambers for over a year, and the members involved should be proud of what they’ve achieved.  In particular, we are pleased that despite opposing voices, the legislation will not only free up more spectrum, but will finally provide public safety with the spectrum it needs to do its vital work.  Access to more spectrum will also help AT&T continue to create more jobs and support next-generation services for our customers.

“In our industry, there has been much focus in recent weeks on whether the FCC should or should not be able to exclude qualified wireless carriers from bidding in these spectrum auctions.  The final legislation speaks clearly on this point:  the FCC may not do so as part of any auction proceeding.  Instead, it could only make such a decision through a separate public rulemaking with general industry applicability, and not through the backdoor of special auction rules.  This provides procedural safeguards, and also an opportunity for a court challenge.  We take the FCC Chairman at his word when he says there is no intent to have closed auctions that deny AT&T and other carriers the ability to fairly and fully participate, but we also feel it important that Congress has now made its views clear as well.

“We also want to commend Chairmen Upton and Walden for not only asserting the right of the Congress to set policy when it comes to auctions, but also for showing a willingness to deal with the FCC’s concerns about procedural flexibility in its conduct of those auctions.  We believe their language strikes the right balance between all these concerns, and are pleased with the outcome, which is very significant for our industry and our country.”

Read More

Auctions Should Be Open, Not Closed

Posted by: AT&T Blog Team on February 8, 2012 at 2:10 pm

The following statement may be attributed to Jim Cicconi, AT&T Senior Executive Vice President of External & Legislative Affair:

“Auctions should be open, not closed.  Any qualified carrier, including those on today’s letter, should have a chance to bid on any spectrum available in an auction.  This group, however, wants the FCC to stack the deck in its favor.  Congress is right to resist this notion.  In fact, what this group proposes could not be called an auction with a straight face.  These companies should be prepared to compete in a fair and open auction, and should stop seeking a rigged spectrum auction that would harm consumers and cost the Treasury billions.”

Read More