The Not So Elusive Middle Ground

Posted by: Jim Cicconi on July 27, 2010 at 2:11 pm

Amidst the flurry of blogs and op-eds on net neutrality, Title II and broadband reclassification that cross my desk on a daily basis, it was a welcome and refreshing change to read Paul Misener’s piece that ran in CNET last week.

Although I don’t agree with everything the vice president for global public policy at had to say (what do you mean network operators haven’t deployed innovative new services?), Paul does lay out a fair airing of the issues to help reach what some people think is an elusive middle ground.

I was particularly pleased to read Paul’s clear recognition that certain quality-of-service/network management practices by ISPs are not only necessary but in the best interest of consumers.  I couldn’t agree more.

Read More

Walking the USF Beat

Posted by: Hank Hultquist on July 22, 2010 at 3:29 pm

If, like me, you’re in a sports fan diaspora (i.e., you grew up someplace else and continue to follow the teams you rooted for when you were a kid), you’re probably familiar with the feeling you get when the local paper has a full-length article about one of your teams.  It’s a mix of excitement (yay! they’re writing about the Sox) and concern (I just know they’re going to somehow get the story wrong).  Well, that’s pretty close to the feeling I had when I saw this story about universal service reform in The Washington Post the other day (If you have not noticed yet, USF is one of the “teams” I follow closely).  As it turned out, I got to indulge both emotions.

First, on the concern front, readers of the Post article may have gotten the misconception that the Federal Universal Service Fund (USF) spends more than $8 billion annually on subsidies for rural America. In fact, the parts of the fund that focus on rural/high cost areas, account for about $4.6 billion. The rest of the money is divided among the E-rate program, about $2.7 billion, (which funds services provided to schools and libraries), the Low-Income program, approx $1.2 billion, (which provides discounts to qualified low-income consumers), and the Rural Healthcare program, approx $214 million, (which funds eligible health care providers for services, including broadband).

Now, on to the excitement.  The WaPo article asked, but did not answer (at least not directly), a very interesting question.  Why is it that AT&T and Verizon, which are the largest recipients of USF dollars, are supporting fundamental changes in the FCC’s high-cost support mechanisms? I mean, why would anyone want to turn down free money?  While I can’t speak for Verizon, I can explain why AT&T wants these mechanisms changed (and don’t worry, I’m not going to say that it’s out of the goodness of our heart).  But, in order to do so in a way that makes sense, I’m first going to provide a little more detail about some of the component parts of the high-cost program. 

Read More

AT&T Statement on USF Bill

Posted by: AT&T Blog Team on July 22, 2010 at 2:29 pm

Today, U.S. Representatives Rick Boucher, Chairman of the Subcommittee on Communications, Technology, and the Internet, and Lee Terry introduced the Universal Service Reform Act of 2010. The following may be attributed to AT&T’s Executive Vice President-Federal Relations, Tim McKone:

“AT&T applauds Chairman Boucher and Rep. Terry for their determined efforts to bring the benefits of broadband services to the citizens of rural America.

“For years, policymakers and Congress have attempted to untangle the knotty dilemma of the universal service fund (USF), and with their leadership and vision, Chairman Boucher and Rep. Terry have set the right path for a historic transformation of the USF.  We are particularly supportive of this legislation because it focuses on modernizing a program that was born before broadband, so that the goal of universal and affordable broadband for all Americans is achieved. 

Read More

AT&T Statement on Sen. Rockefeller and Public Safety Legislation

Posted by: AT&T Blog Team on July 21, 2010 at 5:05 pm

Background – Senator John D. (Jay) Rockefeller IV, Chairman of the U.S. Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee, today announced his intent to introduce the Public Safety Spectrum and Wireless Innovation Act. The following statement may be attributed to Tim McKone, AT&T Executive Vice President-Federal Relations.

“AT&T applauds Senator Rockefeller’s commitment to introduce the Public Safety Spectrum and Wireless Innovation Act.  Spectrum is a scarce and valuable national commodity, but we are encouraged by Senator Rockefeller’s action today that public safety will have sufficient resources to support a nationwide wireless broadband network.  It is vital that our first responders have access to a robust, interoperable network to ensure the public’s safety and preserve national security.   

Read More

The 20th Anniversary of the ADA

Posted by: AT&T Blog Team on July 21, 2010 at 3:31 pm

By Susan Mazrui, AT&T Director of Public Policy

On Monday, I had the privilege to participate in events led by the White House, in partnership with the Federal Communications Commission and the Department of Commerce, highlighting the 20th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the role that technology has played in providing a level playing field for people with disabilities.  As always, Kareem Dale’s remarks were on target but it was his personal experience that speaks most strongly to the fact that, with access to technology, people with disabilities need know no limits.

More than twenty years ago, I first heard about a new bill being circulated that would address the civil rights of people with disabilities. I was writing the final research paper for my master’s degree on a computer with one of the first screen readers ever commercially offered. As a blind person, it was the first time I could edit what I wrote. This was a huge advancement.

Today, thanks to the commitment made to access and to innovation by individuals like Bonnie O’Day, Karen Strauss and Jim Fruchterman, and companies like AT&T, Apple and Research in Motion, I have more power in my little cell phone, even better access to information and more ways to communicate.  I can choose from hundreds of thousands of books without having to ask someone to record it for me. I can access government sites and learn about important activities in the community. I can text my daughter who lives across the country from me – who even thought of texting then?  I still can’t get her to listen to my voicemail messages before calling back but that is a generational issue, not an access one. 

Read More