Happy Birthday NBP

Posted by: Hank Hultquist on March 17, 2011 at 5:33 pm

As we gear up for tomorrow’s event at Georgetown University marking the one-year anniversary of the National Broadband Plan, I guess the inevitable question is, are we there yet? Well, not exactly. But after a somewhat slow start, the FCC has really picked up the pace in the last few months on one of the Plan’s lynchpin proceedings – reform of the Universal Service Fund and intercarrier compensation.  In February, the FCC released a nearly 300-page NPRM. And just this week, the Chairman and his fellow Commissioners jointly blogged about their plans to complete this proceeding by the end of the summer.  As someone who’s been working on these issues for over a decade, all I have to say is “wow.”

Reform of these policies is the most significant thing the FCC can do to promote the objectives of the National Broadband Plan.  This is the point where people usually say something like, “these policies have done an excellent job of bringing about universal telephone service, but it’s now time to retool them for universal broadband.”  I’m not going to say that.  In my opinion, the high-cost universal service program has been a mess since its inception. And the intercarrier compensation “system,” has become a Rube Goldbergesque contraption optimized for little more than arbitrage and the generation of legal fees.

The principal failings of both USF and intercarrier compensation arises from the fact that they were grafted onto a system of public utility regulation that was originally built around local telephone monopolies. While USF and intercarrier compensation were both extended to certain competitive carriers, those extensions proved unstable and unsustainable.  Competitive USF subsidies were ultimately capped to prevent runaway growth, and competitive carrier access charges had to be subjected to a form of dominant carrier regulation. 

As the FCC now prepares for real reform of these vestiges of monopoly regulation, it must recognize that success depends upon making a clean break from the legacy regulatory monopoly model.  The way I think of it is that we must move from a universal service model built on monopoly public utility regulation to something that more closely resembles a procurement process.  By this I mean that the decision to accept universal service funding must be voluntary; that the obligations that go with it must be clearly defined and not subject to “post-contractual” modification; that the obligations must be for a defined period of time; and that there will be no universal service obligations except in those areas for which funding is provided.

If the FCC succeeds in making this transition from the regulatory “monopoly model” to the competitive “procurement model,” it just might be able to fulfill the promise of the National Broadband Plan.

Comments (1)

The FCC has failed to craft a suitable National Broadband Plan and to implement such a plan. There are some good things about the National Broadband Plan that was created but one of its biggest failings is in promoting and mandating increased competition. With more competition comes more consumer choices and better pricing — better service providers = better services. Before AT&T was allowed to re-constitute the Ma Bell system by re-merging with SBC Communications and Bell South AT&T spent more time and money investing in better network infrastructure, technology, scientific research and development etc so they can offer better service and users more bandwidth. Since the mergers AT&T is now trying to limit bandwidth is focusing more on expanding revenue while providing subpar service.

The fixed broadband market is already a duopoly and the wireless market unfortunately looks to be heading in the same direction. A wireless duopoly — would result in less competition for wireless phone service and mobile broadband. The National Broadband Plan has failed in key areas of promoting better competition and consumer choices.

http://attpublicpolicy.com/government-policy/att-on-fcc-data-roaming-mandate/

Maneesh Pangasa April 11, 2011 at 1:06 am

Write a Comment

* Required

 characters available
 

COMMENT MODERATION POLICY

AT&T pre-moderates comments on our blog before they are published. This means there will be a delay between the time a comment is submitted and it appears on the post. Profanity, or topics that are not germane to the post will not be approved for posting. If you wish to communicate with AT&T regarding customer service you may do so via phone at 1-800-331-0500. We are also available on Twitter at @ATTCares.